How do I create voice and openness without lowering standards?

This Course is not part of the Monthly Legislative Updates Subscriber discount structure.
R0.00 (VAT Incl.) Per Person
12 Aug '27
Registration: 10h30 Start: 11h00 End: 12h30
1.5 Hours
Attendance at this seminar will secure 1.5 hour/s verifiable CPD points including other professional bodies (SAICA, SAIBA, SAIT, SAIPA , ACCA, IACSA & IRBA).
Web Based (Online)
NERISSA SINGH
nerissa@probetatraining.co.za

What is a Decision Room?

A Decision Room is a facilitated, scenario-based learning experience where participants work through realistic workplace situations and make decisions at key moments.

As new information and perspectives emerge, participants consider the likely consequences of different leadership responses and have opportunities to reconsider their initial choices.

The focus is not on identifying a single perfect answer, but on strengthening judgement in situations where people, performance, relationships and professional standards intersect.

About this Decision Room

Managers often want people to:

  • speak openly,
  • admit mistakes early,
  • ask for help,
  • challenge ideas,
  • raise risks, and
  • offer different perspectives.

But what happens when someone actually does?

A leader's response in these moments can quietly determine whether people continue speaking up — or learn that silence is safer.

At the same time, creating a psychologically safe environment does not mean avoiding difficult feedback, lowering expectations or allowing commitments to become optional.

Safe AND Accountable Teams explores the leadership tension between:

  • creating enough safety for honesty and challenge, and
  • maintaining enough accountability for quality, ownership and follow-through.

The central question is:

How do I create voice and openness without lowering standards?

Why this matters

The IRBA framework explicitly links constructive challenge with professional quality. At intermediate level it refers to questioning assumptions, raising concerns early and supporting shared understanding; at advanced level it refers to setting expectations for robust challenge, reinforcing psychological safety and ensuring speak-up routes remain effective.

Its Team Leadership and Supervision competency also links leadership with clear expectations, accountability, quality monitoring, workload and sustainable team performance.

CA2025 likewise places communication, leadership, teamwork, feedback and people development within the professional acumen expected in the workplace.

The leadership challenge is therefore not to choose between psychological safety or accountability.

It is to create the conditions for: psychological safety AND accountability.

The foundation

The Decision Room is grounded primarily in positive psychology, workplace well-being, psychological safety and positive leadership, with executive coaching used as the facilitation method.

Key ideas include:

  • Psychological safety: People need to believe that questions, uncertainty, concerns and respectful challenge can be raised without unnecessary interpersonal risk.
  • Accountability and clarity: Safety functions best alongside clear expectations regarding standards, roles, ownership and follow-through.
  • Leader behaviour and signalling: Employees learn what is genuinely safe by observing how leaders respond when people disagree, admit mistakes or deliver unwelcome information.
  • Constructive relationships: Respect and challenge do not need to be opposites. Strong professional relationships should be able to accommodate appropriate disagreement.
  • Learning and error response: How leaders respond to errors can determine whether problems are surfaced early enough to learn from and correct them.
  • Sustainable high performance: The goal is not a comfortable team. It is a team capable of learning, challenging, taking responsibility and delivering quality work.

Executive-coaching questions are used throughout the Decision Room to encourage leaders to examine not only what they expect from others, but also what their own behaviour may be signalling.

By the end of the Decision Room, participants should be better able to:

  • distinguish psychological safety from comfort or the avoidance of difficult conversations
  • recognise behaviours that either encourage or discourage employee voice
  • respond more constructively when employees raise concerns, uncertainty or mistakes
  • invite alternative perspectives without weakening decision accountability
  • maintain clear performance and quality expectations alongside supportive leadership
  • distinguish between a learning opportunity and a matter requiring firmer accountability
  • conduct challenge and feedback conversations while protecting professional relationships
  • reflect on how their own reactions may influence future speak-up behaviour
  • clarify appropriate routes for challenge, support and escalation
  • identify one leadership behaviour that could strengthen both openness and accountability within their team.

The Decision Room will explore:

  • What happens when people speak? Considering how leader responses shape whether team members continue bringing forward concerns and ideas.
  • Challenge without defensiveness: Exploring how leaders can receive different views while still exercising judgement and making decisions.
  • Mistakes, uncertainty and learning: Considering how to respond constructively without removing responsibility.
  • Support without lowering standards: Exploring the difference between understanding circumstances and avoiding accountability.
  • Clear expectations: Considering whether people know what ownership, quality and follow-through actually look like.
  • Leadership under pressure: Reflecting on how time pressure and workload can affect leader tone, accessibility and responses to challenge.
  • Safety AND accountability: Examining how both contribute to sustainable team performance and professional quality.

The specific Decision Room scenarios, turning points, participant choices and leadership reflection tools are introduced during the live experience.

This Decision Room is suitable for:

  • audit seniors
  • supervisors
  • assistant managers
  • managers
  • team leaders
  • reviewers
  • training officers
  • emerging leaders, and
  • other professionals responsible for leading, reviewing or developing people.

It may be especially valuable for leaders who:

  • want employees to raise concerns earlier
  • supervise trainees or junior professionals
  • need to balance support with high professional standards
  • sometimes find challenge or disagreement uncomfortable
  • manage teams working under significant deadline pressure
  • want to improve difficult feedback conversations, or
  • are seeking to strengthen both psychological safety and performance accountability.