Attendance at this seminar will secure 2 hour/s verifiable CPD points including other professional bodies (SAICA, SAIBA, ACCA, IACSA, IRBA & etc)
Tristan White
0118861395
nerissa@probetatraining.co.za
The CA2025 project sees a shift in the approach to the SAICA Assessment Process. Reviewers who are currently providing reviewer feedback to trainees under the 2016 SAICA Assessment Process, will need to themselves go through a transition phase to the new approach to trainee assessment.
• Unlearn old assessment process aspects
• Highlight which principles remain
• Introduce reviewers to the new CA2025 assessment process by drawing parallels to the old assessment process for quicker uptake of the new process
Unlearning aspects of the 2016 Assessment Process, including:
- Terminology, e.g., PSR, TSR
- TSR and PSR decision tree process
- 2016 assessment instrument deadlines
- The need to rate trainees on technical competencies
- Assessment tools of old
- Steps for completing former assessment instruments
Then we’ll look to reiterate what is still relevant between 2016 and 2025 processes, namely:
- Who the role players are, e.g. trainees, reviewer, evaluator, assessor and who can play what role
- Formative assessment
And finally, we’ll embark on a journey to learn about the new CA2025 Process:
- Overview of the CA2025 Assessment Process
- Terminology, e.g., LOR, EAT
- How PVAAs are accepted or rejected / rated / assessed or not
- How to accept / reject technical competence linked to using the IEP, coinciding with the change in emphasis of competence
- New assessment instrument, LOR, and steps for how to complete
o Focus on parts relevant for Reviewer
- LOR decision tree process
- How to handle disagreements, i.e., ratings / rejected evidence
- Understanding SAICA’s Electronic Assessment Tool called EAT and how it impacts the documentation of feedback
- Deadlines and minimum requirements for LORs